Thursday, December 5, 2019

Quality Management for Product Part Approval- MyAssignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theQuality Managementfor Product Part Approval Process. Answer: Recommendation Product Part Approval Process (PPAP) can be used as a tool to ensure quality of the new innovative products. The steps of this process are, Figure 1: Steps of PPAP (Source: Doshi and Desai 2016) A SMART plan is provided below to recommend how these steps can be implemented to ensure quality of new innovative products. Specific Planning phase: It phase will be performed by research and technology department. It will begin with corporate strategy which will include the evaluation of technology department and market objectives. As an output of this stage, specific project mission statement will be gained that will specify market for the product, quality and constraints. Measureable Concept development: Target market of the product will be measured in this phase along with alternative product concepts. For creativity, one of more concepts will be tested (Nanda 2016). Based on the tests, it will be easy to measure which concept will produce an innovative and quality product. Achievable Detail Design: Once the concept is selected, detailed design of the new product can be achieved. It will be done by refining industrial design and finding out suppliers for primary components. Realistic Testing and Refinement: This phase includes construction and assessment of prototypes of the product. It will help the development team to test the reliability, creativity, quality, performance and lifetime of the product (Nirupama et al. 2013). Through this step, development will understand whether the product is creative or not and whether it will deliver quality to the consumers or not (Lafayette et al. 2017). Times Production ramp: Once testing is done, the last step will include the process of entire manufacturing system. Workers will be trained in this phase for at least one month. Problems in the production method will be identified within 1 week. The first bunch of new product will be launched in the market within two months. Conclusion This report has highlighted the existing practices of quality management in the service industry along with the issues and future trends of quality management. From this report, it is found that companies under retail industry are several strategies to maintain quality management. In this report some of those strategies are discussed such as supply chain management, quality assurance and traceability lucidity of products. However, this report also displays some issues faced by the companies while maintaining quality management. The biggest issue is the desire of the consumers for creativity and new products. Customers are continuously looking for new products and innovative products. In order to gain competitive advantage, companies are frequently introducing new products; however, quality of the products is getting hampered. If quality is not up to the mark then the companies will not be able meet consumer expectations. Therefore, it was required to implement a process that will en sure quality and will allow developing innovative products. In the recommendation part, a recommendation is provided in the form of SMART analysis that will help the service companies to manufacture innovative and quality products which will fulfill the expectations of the consumers. Reference List Doshi, J.A. and Desai, D.A., 2016. Role of Production Part Approval Process in Continuous Quality Improvement and Customer Satisfaction. InInternational Journal of Engineering Research in Africa(Vol. 22, pp. 174-183). Trans Tech Publications. Nirupama, M.K., Kumar, V. and Shivaprakash, D., 2013. DESIGNING THE PRODUCTION PART APPROVAL PROCESS (PPAP) TO REDUCE THE TOTAL LEAD TIME. Nanda, V., 2016.Quality management system handbook for product development companies. CRC Press. Lafayette, M., Li, Z.S. and Webster, S., 2017, January. A risk assessment method for production part approval process. InReliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), 2017 Annual(pp. 1-4). IEEE.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.